Puma Goes to Sea (Again)

By -
U.S. 5TH FLEET AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (Sept. 25, 2012) U.S. Navy Senior Chief Engineman Bradley Williamson, left, and Engineman 1st Class Michael Lamb assigned to Riverine Squadron Two, Detachment Three, conducts pre-flight checks on the Puma AE (Pointer Upgraded Mission Ability – All Environment) aircraft aboard Royal Fleet Auxiliary amphibious landing dock vessel RFA Cardigan Bay (L3009), as Royal Navy minehunter HMS Shoreham (M112) operates nearby. The U.S. Navy is currently testing Puma AE for land and shipboard operations in the U.S. 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility (AOR). U.S. 5th Fleet's mission is to conduct maritime security operations, defeat violent extremism and strengthen partner nations' maritime capabilities in order to promote security and stability in the U.S. Central Command AOR. (Royal Navy photo/Released)
Continuing a recent string of articles on unmanned air vehicles, this month's US Naval Institute's Proceedings features an article (membership required) by CDR Rich Lebron, Commanding Officer of the destroyer USS Benfold (DDG-65) and two other officers in his wardroom.  The piece highlights recent at-sea testing of the Puma AE small tactical unmanned aerial system onboard Benfold last year.

The article discusses the utility that even a short-range, hand-launched UAV can bring to a surface combatant.  Benfold tested the Puma off the California Coast against simulated small boat attacks and to monitor a visit, board, search, and seizure (VBSS) exercise with similar results.

Lebron et al conclude that despite range limitations, the Puma is quite suitable for use by independent steaming surface combatants such as Benfold, which usually operates without external support on long duration ballistic-missile-defense missions.  It is affordable, requires no additional crew, little additional training, and provides a much-needed aerial surveillance capability for Flight I Arleigh Burke destroyers that normally don't embark helicopters.  Benfold's Puma testing follows additional at-sea demonstrations of the UAS in the Middle East and Western Pacific the past few years.  Given this amount of operational validation, it's time for the Navy to decide whether or not to make a minimal investment to provide its non-helicopter equipped ships an organic aerial intelligence, surveillance, and reconaissance capability.

Comments

  1. Marie J. NunezFebruary 18, 2013 at 9:34 PM

    In the gulf of Mexico, some beach goers mistake them for UFO saucers. It's just that some are not aware of the military drone testing by the navy and the light does alter its shape in the horizon.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2013 Naval Drones Survey

By -
What are the latest trends in unmanned systems?  What technologies show the most promise to enhance future naval operations?  Readers of this site represent naval and industry professionals, academics, and other interested parties from more than 160 countries. We're offering an anonymous survey to understand this wealth of knowledge contained in our readers' insights and experience.  The results will be discussed in future posts in this space.  Please take a few minutes to respond to the 8 easy questions. Link for mobile sites: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RT5YKFB *Note - you will not be emailed, phoned, nor otherwise accosted for responding.
Read more...

Inspector Gadgets: Drones in the Hangar

By -
Image
Checking an aircraft for damage can be arduous and meticulous work,  but last week’s issue of  The Economist   highlights  an experimental commercial approach. In simple terms, the Remote Intelligent Survey Equipment for Radiation ( RISER ) drone is a quadcopter with LIDAR and forms the basis for a system to use lasers to automatically detect damage to airliners. The obvious naval application for inspector drones would be for ground-, carrier, and surface vessel-based fixed-wing and helicopter units, although the configurations for each aircraft type and location might make some more practical than others. For example it probably makes more sense to consolidate expertise in inspector drones at regional maintenance and readiness centers than to try to outfit a unit in the small helicopter hangar of every destroyer. But there’s always something to be said for an operational capability. While  The Economist  notes that the drones are allowed at Luton airport, UK, to “operate only
Read more...

CHINA SEIZES U.S. NAVY UNDERWATER DRONE

By -
Image
On December 15th 2016, the Chinese Navy seized an American unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) operating in international waters off the Western coast of the Philippines. The  USNS Bowditch ,  an unarmed T-AGS class hydro-graphic survey ship, was being shadowed by a People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) salvage vessel identified as a Dalang-III class (ASR-510). Graphic by: CIMSEC Member Louis MV The UUV had surfaced as part of a pre-programmed instruction, and sent  a radio signal marking it’s position for pick-up. As the Bowditch was preparing to recover the drone from the water, a small boat crew from the Dalang III raced in and plucked the unmanned vessel. The incident occurred approximately 50 nautical miles northwest of Subic, Luzon. While the exact type of drone is unknown, there have been several instances of U.S. Navy   Slocum Gliders   snagged in local fishermens’ nets or washed ashore on beaches in the Philippines. This type of drone is not weaponized, and is used to c
Read more...